|
|
|
Global urbanization and protected areas Challenges and opportunities posed by a major factor of global change — and creative ways of responding Online version of a paper by Ted Trzyna published in 2007 by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) and the California Institute of Public Affairs / InterEnvironment
|
|
|
SECTION 1 OF THE WEB VERSION (WEB PAGE URB-1)
PREFACE
This is one of a series of reports on impacts of global change on
protected areas commissioned by IUCN as part of its Ecosystems, Protected Areas, and People Project. Online versions of this paper, including an executive summary, are posted on the Web sites of IUCN’s Protected Areas Learning Network,
http://www.parksnet.org,
and the California Institute of Public Affairs,
http://www.InterEnvironment.org/cipa/urbanization.org.
IUCN defines a protected area as “an area of land and/or sea especially
dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and
of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal
or other effective means.”
This paper is based primarily on numerous interviews and discussions
with conservation and urban leaders over the past four years, both in
the field and at various conferences. I have also drawn on recent and
classic literature in conservation, urban studies, and other subjects.
Although those who helped me are too numerous to list, I want to mention
those most directly involved from mid-2005 to the end of 2006. Many of
them are my associates in an initiative on cities and conservation
centered in the Task Force on Cities and Protected Areas of the World
Commission on Protected Areas of IUCN (IUCN 2006a).
In general: John Davidson, Jeffrey A. McNeely, and Adrian Phillips, my
close colleagues and mentors in IUCN’s urban effort; and those who
contributed articles to The Urban Imperative (Trzyna 2005a), an IUCN
book based on a workshop at the Fifth World Parks Congress, held in
Durban, South Africa, in 2003.
Participation in relevant workshops and conferences included events
sponsored by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the UN
Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) in Havana, Cuba; the World
Academy of Art and Science in Zagreb, Croatia; the University of
Plymouth at Schumacher College in Dartington, England; ICLEI – Local
Governments for Sustainability in Cape Town, South Africa; the
Universidad Anбhuac de Xalapa in Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico; and ICLEI
again in Rome, Italy. In addition, I participated in two workshops
cosponsored by the IUCN task force: Urban Nature 2006, in Cape Town,
organized by the South African National Biodiversity Institute and the
City of Cape Town; and a workshop on cities and biodiversity in Nairobi,
Kenya, organized by UNEP, the Kenya Wildlife Service, and the IUCN task
force.
In Kenya: Director Julius Kipng’etich, Paul Gaithitu, Anne W. Kahihia,
Wilson Korir, and Gideon Amboga, all of the Kenya Wildlife Service; and
Pedro da Cunha e Menezes, a Brazilian diplomat posted in Nairobi who is
a Deputy Leader of the IUCN task force. Thanks to a very generous
invitation from KWS, I visited the parks described below and conducted
interviews in September 2006.
In South Africa: George Davis, South African National Biodiversity
Institute; Tanya Goldman, Cape Flats Nature; Brett Myrdal, Manager,
Table Mountain National Park. I visited the sites mentioned and
conducted interviews in March 2006, as well as on previous occasions.
In the Californias: Joseph T. Edmiston, Executive Director, Santa Monica
Mountains Conservancy; Michael Eaton and Scott Morrison, The Nature
Conservancy; Pat Flanagan, Executive Director, Mojave Desert Land Trust;
Superintendents Curt Sauer and Woody Smeck, U.S. National Park Service;
Paul Smith, attorney, conservationist, and board chair of the
organization I direct, the California Institute of Public Affairs. I
have visited the areas mentioned on numerous occasions and participated
in several transboundary meetings.
My thanks to all who helped me.
This paper was prepared under a contract between IUCN and the California Institute of Public Affairs, with funding from the United Nations Global Environment Facility. I am solely responsible for the interpretations and conclusions in the paper, as well as any errors of fact.
Ted Trzyna
Oasis of Mara, Mojave Desert, California
1 January 2007
_________________________________________
ABOUT THE AUTHOR AND SPONSORS
Author
For information about the author, see Note 1 in
Section 7 of the Web version of this paper.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)
Founded in 1948, IUCN brings together States, government agencies, and a diverse range of nongovernmental organizations in a unique world partnership: over 1,000 members in all, spread across some 140 countries.
As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage, and assist societies
throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature
and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and
ecologically sustainable.
IUCN builds on the strengths of its members, networks, and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional, and global levels. For further
information: http://www.iucn.org.
California Institute of Public Affairs / InterEnvironment
Founded in 1969, CIPA works to improve policy-making on complex issues.
Its main focus is on environmental policy in California and
internationally. InterEnvironment is CIPA’s international program. Most
of CIPA’s international work is done with and through IUCN. For further
information:
http://www.cipahq.org.
1. BACKGROUND a. Urbanization as a factor of global change Urbanization has long been one of the major forces shaping the world, and it will continue to be so. Few protected areas will not be affected by urbanization in some way. Urbanization refers to the process by which rural areas take on urban characteristics. It also refers to more concentration of people in human settlements. Currently, most attention to urbanization is focused on a United Nations estimate that, in 2007, 50% of the world’s population will be living in cities, rising from about 30% in 1950. This figure is projected to reach 61% by 2030 (UN 2004). Although these estimates are useful in drawing attention to the urbanization phenomenon, they are just that, estimates. They are based on national definitions of “urban” that use different criteria (UN 2005) and on numbers that sometimes derive from outdated or questionable census data. Also, these are global figures. When the data are disaggregated by world region, they show marked differences in the level and pace of urbanization. In the Americas, Europe, and Oceania, the proportion of people living in urban areas is already over 70%. Although the figures for Africa and Asia are currently much lower, 39% and 37%, respectively, many cities in those regions will double their populations in the next fifteen years (UN 2004). In addition, there are pronounced differences among countries within these world regions. In Africa, for example, the degree of urbanization ranges from under 15% in Burundi and Malawi, to over 85% in Libya. In the Americas, it ranges from under 40% in Haiti and Guatemala, to over 85% in Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and Venezuela.2 In the first three decades of the 21st century, the world’s urban population is projected to increase from 2.9 billion to 5 billion. Almost all of this increase will be absorbed by urban areas of less developed regions. Based on current trends, most of these new urban dwellers will live in overcrowded slums, often situated on marginal and dangerous land, without sanitation or easily accessible access to clean water. According to the Cities Alliance, a World Bank-based partnership of official development agencies and global associations of local authorities, “ignoring this policy challenge risks condemning hundreds of millions of people to an urban future of misery, insecurity, and environmental degradation on a truly awesome scale” (CA 2004). Contrary to a commonly held belief, “megacities” (urban agglomerations of 10 million inhabitants or more) account for less than 4% of the world’s population. Most urban dwellers live in settlements with fewer than half a million inhabitants. Some of the world’s fastest growing cities have between 1 and 5 million people or are much smaller (UN 2004). In this paper, the word “cities” includes smaller as well as larger human settlements. Even villages can have significant impacts on ecologically sensitive protected areas. (See Note 3 for definitions of urban terms.) Much has been written about why the world is urbanizing. The reasons are complex. Rural-to-urban migration and international migration account for most urbanization, but migration from cities to rural areas that then become urbanized also occurs. Wars can bring people into cities, but they can also have the opposite effect, depending on where people feel safer. Natural disasters can cause people to move out of cities, but those people may then contribute to urban growth elsewhere. b. Uncertain consequences of climate change To these already significant trends must be added the consequences of climate change. Two of these deserve special mention: rising sea levels, and more frequent and more intense weather events. Rising sea levels, combined with storm surges, will force migration to higher ground. Roughly a billion people live at sea level or just a few meters above it (Mastny 2006), and many of the world’s cities are situated in coastal lowlands. As conditions worsen, where will these people go? How will their resettlement, guided or unguided, affect protected areas? Rising sea levels will also submerge low-lying coastal protected areas in and near cities, making nature less accessible to urban residents and resulting in increased use of inland protected areas. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects a rise in global sea level of up to 88 cm between 1990 and 2100 (IPCC 2001a), with regional variations. However, other scenarios are much less optimistic, such as the “abrupt climate change” scenarios set out by the U.S. National Research Council (2002). The cities most immediately vulnerable to sea-level rise are Asian megacities sitting on subsiding river delta land. However, many other coastal cities throughout the world are vulnerable to flooding from storm surges, and will become uninhabitable well before they disappear underwater because of waterlogging and saltwater intrusion (IPCC 2001b). More than words can tell, an online interactive map produced by the University of Arizona (2006) shows in graphic detail the inundations that would occur with one- to five-meter rises in global sea levels. Another consequence of climate change is more frequent and more intense weather events. Such events demonstrate the value of protected areas to cities. During a 24-hour period on 26-27 July 2005, an unprecedented monsoon rainstorm dumped almost a meter of rain on Mumbai, India, a city on the Indian Ocean that ranks sixth among the world’s urban agglomerations, with a population of 19.8 million. Severe flooding resulted, and over a thousand people lost their lives. But loss of life and property damage could have been much greater had it not been for 104-sq-km Sanjay Gandhi National Park, which lies entirely within the city limits. The heavily forested park absorbed much of the rainfall (Sahgal 2005). c. What is “urban”? A final general point about urbanization: The urban-rural distinction is becoming less meaningful. For centuries, city and countryside have been seen as opposites. Now, in much of the world, differences between urban and rural communities are becoming blurred as advanced technologies and the global economy penetrate areas formerly considered remote, and urban and rural areas become more linked and interdependent. Steve Bass (2004) of the UK’s Department for International Development calls for “Ditching the Dichotomy” in terms of development strategies and points out that it has become hard to even define the terms “urban” and “rural.” d. Cities and larger ecosystems: The context The Task Force on Cities and Protected Areas of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas has arrived at some general conclusions about connections and disconnections between cities and larger ecosystems (IUCN 2006b) that are useful context for this paper: · Cities depend on a multitude of goods and services from their surrounding regions, and increasingly from ecosystems far removed from the cities themselves. These ecosystem services are cogently described in Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (MA 2005), a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. · Cities can relieve pressure on rural and natural areas by concentrating human populations; achieving economies of scale in such areas as energy, housing, transportation, and solid waste reuse and recycling; and providing services such as health and secondary and higher education. On the other hand, cities are centers of consumption of resources and can cause harm to their surroundings through sprawl; depleting such resources as water and forests; and generating solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes. This consumption and pollution often also imposes burdens on distant ecosystems. These complex relationships are discussed in detail in the “Urban Systems” chapter of another volume of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (McGranahan, Marcotullio, et al. 2005). · Nature is essential to people’s well-being. Most importantly, children need direct experience of nature for healthy intellectual and emotional development. This has been well-documented (Kahn and Kellert 2002, Louv 2005). Natural areas in and near cities are anchors to the Earth; they provide opportunities for exercise, education, and renewal. Nature is important even for the poorest of the urban poor. 2. HOW URBANIZATION AFFECTS PROTECTED AREAS a. Forms of urbanization Urbanization that affects protected areas takes several forms that are not mutually exclusive: Urban sprawl: Building over unprotected rural land between a city and a protected area, sometimes surrounding it. The prime examples given below are from Kenya (Nairobi National Park) and the Californias (particularly the border area and Joshua Tree National Park). Ribbon development: Building along roads radiating from cities, often a precursor to urban sprawl. The main examples are from the Californias (again, the border area and Joshua Tree National Park). Urban intensification and infill: Examples are from Kenya (Lake Nakuru National Park), Cape Town, the Californias (Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area), Hong Kong, and Tarawa in Kiribati. Coalescing “megapolitan” regions: These are large-scale polycentric networks of metropolitan and smaller urban areas (note that a megapolis is not the same as a megacity or a megalopolis3). The example, with an explanation, is from the Californias (The desert: Protected areas in a coalescing megapolis). Tourism developments: These are often enclaves, usually beach resorts, that cater almost exclusively to visitors from other countries. Examples are given from Kenya (Mombasa Marine National Park) and Cape Verde. Second-home and retirement developments: To date, most of these have catered to people within countries, for example, in the “Sunbelt” of the USA, or in countries relatively nearby, for example Spain and Portugal for Northern Europeans, and Mexico and the Caribbean for North Americans. However, cheap air travel and political change are opening up new possibilities. An example is given from Cape Verde. Growing gateway communities: The example is from the Californias (Yosemite National Park). Growing settlements within protected areas: The example is Yosemite. Informal settlements: The main examples are from Cape Town. Transboundary urbanization: The example is from the Californias (the border area). b. Impacts of urbanization Impacts of urbanization on protected areas include: Fragmentation of habitat: Examples are given from Kenya (Nairobi National Park), South Africa (Edith Stephens Wetland Park), and the Californias (the border area and Joshua Tree National Park). Edge effects: The results of disturbance of the natural ecosystem along an abrupt transition with developed or disturbed land. These effects occur in virtually all protected areas in urban and urbanizing environments.. Water quantity: Urbanization can result in too little or too much water in protected areas. Examples are given from Kenya (drawing down of the aquifer in Nairobi National Park) and South Africa (flooding of the Edith Stephens Wetlands Park). Water pollution: The prime examples are from Kenya (Lake Nakuru National Park), the Californias (Tijuana Estuary in the border area), and Kiribati (Tarawa). Air pollution: The main example is from the Californias (Sierra Nevada parks). Solid waste: The example is from the Californias (Joshua Tree National Park). Noise: The example is from the Californias (The desert: Protected areas in a coalescing megapolis). Light pollution: The example is from the Californias (Joshua Tree National Park). Human-wildlife conflicts: These range from deer grazing on garden flowers to predators killing humans and livestock. The examples are from Kenya (Nairobi National Park) and the Californias (Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area). Introduction of exotic invasive species: The examples are from Cape Town (Table Mountain National Park), the Californias (Joshua Tree National Park), and Australia. Fire along the wildland-urban interface: This can be natural, accidental, or intentional. Examples are given from Cape Town (Table Mountain National Park) and the Californias (Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area). Crime: Criminal activity in protected areas in or near cities ranges from vandalism, theft of park property, and incidental poaching to large-scale poaching, arson, mugging, and murder. In some cases, international criminal syndicates are involved. Examples are given from Cape Town (Table Mountain National Park) and the Californias (the border area). Minor problems with urban visitors: These include such problems as over-visitation and collection of plant material such as firewood, wildflowers, and medicinal herbs. These problems are found in virtually all urban and peri-urban protected areas in both developing and industrialized countries. MAIN PAGE FOR THE WEB VERSION OF THIS PAPER
InterEnvironment California Institute of Public Affairs P.O. Box 189040 Sacramento, California 95818, USA Tel. (1 916) 442-2472 - Fax on request
|
|
|
|
|